I started before I became a Christian, at the tender age of nine, mainly because I had an unhealthy obsession with the end of the world. I ate up the book of Revelation, and even as an “unchurched” youth I clearly recall reading it to my friends at sleepovers.
When I became a Christian at twelve, my church family immediately put me on a “Bible in One Year” schedule which I stuck to diligently throughout the majority of my youth and young adulthood.
For the five years I spent in seminary, this was boosted up to four times over the course of one year, after a college professor my freshman year heard how I had also made it a habit to read through The Lord of the Rings, the Hobbit, and the Chronicles of Narnia every year and challenged me to read the Word of God as often as I read my “worldly entertainment.”
After all those readings (which, after a simple bit of math you may deduce was about 26 times), I can’t to this day recall ever reading about some of the atrocities listed in the Bible. I clearly did read them, as I read and meditated on every word of Scripture, but somehow I missed them.
I remember reading about how Onan (Genesis 38:8-10) was punished with death for not impregnating his sister-in-law, but I didn’t see it as the act of a God who despises women and orders men to treat them like cattle. I didn’t see it an an act of incest. I didn’t consider Onan’s death as a pointless murder at the hands of a God who can’t stand to be defied, and didn’t view Onan as a hero for having a conscience and rebelling against a God who told him to do something he knew to be wrong. No, I saw it as a justified punishment for a man who defied a good, Holy, and just God whose beautiful purpose was to strengthen the family line of Onan’s brother.So here are a few of the things I failed to see in the Bible as a Christian which, if I had only chosen to think clearly and critically, I may have used to my benefit to escape religion much sooner than I did.
10: Being a good Christian means treating your slaves well.
Most people, when confronted with the idea that the Bible contains some terrible things, like to point out that that’s just “Old Testament stuff,” and that the bad things in the Bible were written for people living in a rougher and less civilized time. Gentle Jesus and his followers weren’t responsible for any of the atrocities often attributed to the Patriarchs.
Slavery is a terrible thing that has occurred all throughout history. There’s no doubting that the Old Testament does clearly allow for slavery, but surely, not the New Testament!
Guess again.
Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour, that the name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed. And they that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren; but rather do them service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort. (I Timothy 6:1-2, KJV)
This brings us to the best part about Biblical slavery. Did you know…
9: Beating Your Slaves is Perfectly Acceptable
Yes, there is a verse in the Bible that tells us it’s okay to beat your slave, as long as he’s only bedridden for two days. From the context, it can be inferred that, if the slave does eventually die after a few days, that’s okay too, because, well, he is property after all.
It's not just OK to beat your slaves; the Bible tells you how. Image: How to Beat Your Slave, The Thinking Atheist; click image for video
And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.” (Exodus 21:20 KJV)
8: Boys Will Be Boys, and God Will Kill Them For It
I remember many times in my youth making fun of my pastor (often to his face) about his receding hair line. Of course, my pastor was a good sport about it and often made fun of himself. I’m glad that I live in a world where God doesn’t exist, because if he did I may have received worse punishment than the fair recession of my own hair.
The natural response of a child, upon seeing a bald man, is to make fun of him. The natural response of a loving and just God upon hearing children making fun of one of his servants for being bald is to have them eviscerated.
And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them. (II Kings 2:23-24 KJV)
I once looked on this with respect for the man of God. Now, I realize that whether the kids were saying “Ha ha, you’re bald,” or “Leave town because we don’t want to hear your message” or “Have a great time in town, baldy, because we plan to stab you and take all your money,” there is no moral way to explain sending bears to disembowel them.
This is actually one of the best-known stories in the Bible of God’s atrocities. I still have a hard time understanding how I didn’t see this as being awful back when I first read it, and the 25 or so times after that, and all the times I heard it preached as though it were something wonderful.
Next up is another story I never really picked up on, and which most people don’t.
7: “One More Night With Them Stinkin’ Frogs.”

Lots of frogs legs . . . but that murdering of all firstborn might be going a bit far. Image: middletownbiblechurch.org
The really interesting part of the story isn’t Pharaoh’s insistence that he spend “one more night in sin,” as the preachers will tell you the passage means. It’s that it was God, not Pharaoh, who made Pharaoh say no when Moses asked him to let his people go.
And he hardened Pharaoh’s heart, that he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had said. (Exodus 7:13 KJV)
Because God hardened Pharaoh’s heart, the people of Egypt continued to suffer the plagues, ending with the death of the firstborn child of every Egyptian household. (Jews celebrate this massacre with Passover.)
That’s a lot of innocent deaths for God’s punishment of one man . . . who did something God made him do. Sounds almost like . . .
6: 70,000 Innocent People Killed Because Someone Counted Them
And Joab gave the sum of the number of the people unto David. And all they of Israel were a thousand thousand and an hundred thousand men that drew sword: and Judah was four hundred threescore and ten thousand men that drew sword. But Levi and Benjamin counted he not among them: for the king’s word was abominable to Joab. And God was displeased with this thing; therefore he smote Israel. And David said unto God, I have sinned greatly, because I have done this thing: but now, I beseech thee, do away the iniquity of thy servant; for I have done very foolishly . . .So the LORD sent pestilence upon Israel: and there fell of Israel seventy thousand men. (I Chronicles 21:9-14 KJV)
God told David not to count the people. Most preachers I’ve ever heard will tell you it’s because he didn’t want the great numbers of Israel to go to David’s head. God wanted David to know that it was his help, not the numbers of the children of Israel, that was responsible for his victory in battle.
Whether or not you think this was a terrible sin, anyone of good conscience should be able to see that killing 70,000 innocent people because of the sin of one man (again, that sin was counting) is not the act of a loving, just, good God. Especially not when you consider that the method of execution was pestilence: It wasn’t just the 70,000 fighting men of Israel who died, but the old and infirm, women, and children. They just didn’t get counted.
…
Stay tuned for the next installment. So far these have been instances in Scripture any Sunday School student could drudge up and try to explain away. Don’t worry: it gets much worse.









70,000 Innocent People Killed Because Someone Counted Them
I've always wondered how the writers knew 70,000 had died. Did they count the bodies? I guess counting dead people was okay. Was it still a sin to subtract the 70,000 figure from the previous total and get the number of the ones left? Would that have meant 70,000 more would have to be killed? And on and on and on. How long would it have taken before there weren't 70,000 left to kill? Inquiring minds want to know.
Bible math mikespeir ? Like how 2 boys ,One kills another, and the killers builds a city in the land of Nod complete with a wife? Bible Math? A City ? 1+1=2-1= An entire city ?
Just remember, they are all Jewish. Just not the right kind of Jewish I suppose? Many concepts in the Bible don't work and that is why we in America have outlawed them. Unfortunately, not enough.
Of course, Greek, Nordic, European, Asian, American Indian, South Americans, Eskimos and Middle Easterners don't count as people to the writers of the Old Testament.
You didn't even mention that in Exodus Moses tied his ass to a tree and walked a mile
Wow! Mala Heir looks like you touched a cord with the fundy's ! Like you found there G -spot!
Thumbs this up! No words! your blog and article are always useful!
Pingback: Kadry i place
You need to read 2 Samuel 24 along with 1 Chronicles 21, so that you see that it was actually God who incited David to take the census in the first place.
HIAll,
These are all things that I read as I struglled with my CHristianity and , in fact, read them and hated them before I came to know Christ as my savior.
For instance why kill Uzzah, in 2 Samuel 6 when he put his hand on the Ark to stop it from falling… ? There are so many questions But, and Francis Chan says this better on his youtube video, we do not know the mind of God and who are we to second guess his thoughts.
When we take antibiotics perhaps those poor little bacteria are weeping and wailing the loss of their brethren … and yet, we are told to take the whole course of medicine so that every tiny little bug is wiped out.
Sorry, guys, I hope that in your quest for truth and righteousness you will come to understand that God is God and we are not. As it says in Psalm 100 – “we are His people the Sheep of His pasture and it is He who has made us, not we ourselves.”
So I conclude with saying that while much of this does now make sense to me other parts will have to wait until I sit at God’s f eet and ask him myself! And, as Joshua put it! “As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.”
“Be still and know that I am God” Oh and don’t forget when he answers Job’s questions 38:1-3 “Brace yourself like a man. I will question you and you will answer me!” Then if you read on he says very eloquently.. that… You know nothing about his ways!
May the Lord bless you all in your questions and struggles!
Paula I think you should do some research on sheep and the way they act. Very enlightening.
” if I had only chosen to think clearly and critically, I may have used to my benefit to escape religion much sooner than I did.” Obviously you are not capable of doing that.
Wow, another xtian troll takes to our boards, to tell us how questioning god’s rules, and his actions are wrong. We should all just shut up and obey, huh?
Sorry, poor little sheep. “Before no printed idol will I bend my knee in acquiescence, and he who says thou shalt to me is my mortal foe”.
Our struggle is to break the stranglehold of your religion on our society, and if your god blesses that, he’s a fool in addition to being a hypocrite.
What is important is how I live my life today….Believe what ever you choose, you have choices. I think I would rather believe in something that can determine if I live or die. Something that has control of my death??? Society can’t stop that…bottom line. God didn’t say how we were going to die, but that it was bound to happen. Explain to me the things that go on in this world today, that are simular to what has already been written. What was said to come,and have already come to pass. Like you writing this article. So what I say to all of this..I’m going to take my chances with the one who says there is a heaven and a hell. Its up to God where God puts you. I would rather come to the end of my life and find out there is no God than to come to the end of my life and find out there is one and I challenged what is written…….
And what if you get to the end of your life and find that you picked the wrong god, and that by worshiping the one you chose you only made the real one more and more angry?
I think Homer Simpson said something similar…
To quote:
Explain to me the things that go on in this world today, that are simular to what has already been written. What was said to come,and have already come to pass.
Like what exactly? Specifics please.
To quote:
Its up to God where God puts you. I would rather come to the end of my life and find out there is no God than to come to the end of my life and find out there is one and I challenged what is written…….
Oh please don’t be dizzy enough to resort to what amounts to the religious version of Schrodinger’s Cat.
I say this as a Christian..if you say you believe in God because you’re scared of making Him angry at you then you really don’t believe in God and have a faith so weak that it’s practically nonexistant. That and your argument boils down to turning God into a tyrant and monster.
You want an example? Well using your argument God is pleased with Hitler for believing in God while God is, at the same time, angry at Ghandi for not believing in God. Which means, using your logic, Hitler is in heaven and Ghandi is in hell.
Under what sane sense of morality does that make any sense?
I suggest you read Matthew 25:31-46 for a better sense of how one should live one’s life.
Why is it that there is not ONE historian who lived during the lifetime of Jesus who wrote about him and his huge following and miracles? NOT ONE! This leads me to believe that he never even existed but was a figment of many imaginations.
I suppose the accounts of Josephus and Tacitus mean nothing to you and you are so much more enlightened than the vast majority of historians(including secular) who do not doubt the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.
Maybe YOU are the one who is refusing to come to terms with reality.
Which Tacitus would that be?
Aeneas Tacticus who was born in the 4th century BC?
Or Aelianus Tacticus who was born in the 2nd century AD?
I’m sure you’ll figure out the problem with claiming that either one was a contemporary of Jesus….
Correct. Sock it to him.
wow
Why is that a religion that is solely based on hearsay held is such high regard when not one book of the new testament was event written until nearly 60 years of the alleged death of the alleged Christ.
My question, along the lines of Mcpeake, is why is it that in the entire lifetime of every single human being that has ever lived that not one piece of real, verifiable, testable or duplicated evidence has ever been produced by a single human being alive or dead in all of human history for a single supernatural anything?
Not one piece of evidence has ever been produced nor shown to be real ever for anything supernatural from a god to ghosts. Nothing, Nadda, Zip, Zero, Zilch.
Lack of evidence is in fact, evidence of absence.
One day you will encounter God face to face. I wouldn't want to be in your shoes then, and neither will you.